The PLJ 1996 SC (AJK) one hundred sixty five situation involved a match for possession submitted by the predecessor-in-fascination on the respondents. The demo courtroom decreed the go well with, but the primary appellate court dismissed it to the grounds of not impleading other co-sharers as defendants. The Higher Court https://judahdyinu.onesmablog.com/5-easy-facts-about-land-ownership-and-title-lawyer-in-karachi-described-71602778